misterhee wrote:@ninavizz.
Just so I am clear with what you are saying - you are saying that certain characters come through escaped ( e.g quote marks come through as " etc) ?
Correct. I'll work on doin' some screengrabs thru Virtual Chumby, and will post them here.
Yeah... the "issue" with monospaced fonts, is that they're just not legible.
The aesthetic of old typewriters and telegraph machines really involves more of a Courier font, and also involves a lot of "random" irregularities programmed into the font, to present the illusion of keys not being depressed all the way, ink not rolling onto the letters fully, etc. This of course isn't at all legible, either.
The primary aesthetic of the Tweeter screen, imho, is the adorable little "peekaboo!" birdie shouting the message-bubble. To me, that captures everything about Twitter, beautifully, and without compromise to performance or legibility. The monospaced font looks almost like the app didn't load fully, and is having font-rendering issues... tho more relevant, it's just plain hard to read. Looking at a Twitter page in my browser, I can easily scan up and down the page, no problem... and it takes me at least 3x as long to read each message on Tweeter, as it does on Twitter.
In a small footprint like Chumby's screen provides, you really have to strike a very careful balance between "expressive" aesthetics, and thoughtfully executed functional bits that have to be discoverable, functional (if a control), and legible. If just the right few things are done expressively, with everything else just focussing on doing the job at hand as efficiently as possible, the user's focus all goes to the one key bit of expressed playfulness... the use of the api is seamlessly cognitively-absorbed, and everyone is happy.
Anyhoo- just additional clarification. I'll shut the hell up, and produce some mocks to put my pixels where my mouth is, before jabbering design blather any further...