nofix wrote:The Chumby should be exploiting Internet Radio, as it could easily be it's #1 selling point. Unfortunately, I'm guessing it will be relegated to the current lineup of presets, and open-audio formats - you know, since that's more important than pleasing it's users.
The Roku SoundBridge and Logitech SqueezeBox already do this(among others), so how would it be the #1 selling point? If I wanted iRadio, I would have bought something with a iRadio formfactor and not bought a Chumby. The Chumby has no line out (the headphone can work, but it's not line out), no SPDIF (Coax or TOSlink) and I bet the spec for the audio are not as great as a device made for iRadio. THe OEM speakers are OK, but nothing to jam to.
Sonos is aother way to go too.
I thought Chumby's main dealio was it played Widgets, had a touchscreen and could do clock stuff (and even the clock was not what it was made for according to Chumby).
So other then not having support for a lot of CODECs (e.g WMA.OGG, APE, AAC, FLAC and such), what is the issue, it has Shoutcast which has a butt-load of stations.
Real presets would be nice. WHere you could log into the CHumby's internal webpage and add URL's of your favorite stations.
now don't get me wrong, I love my Chumby and I even use the iRadio too. But to really use iRadio I use my Roku. Heck even a WMLS11B is more geared to iRadio and you can get them for$35 on eBay.
More pending in IMHO would be UPNP support so the Chumby could connect to my media server (e.g. Windows Media Connect/WMP11) or other support like direct SlimServer support (which would give you (NoFix) all the iRadio you wanted) or Twonky or even FireFly. Right now the Chumby is a "dumb client" to SlimServer if the Chumby would work like SoftSqueeze then it would be a great user expericance.
Just my 2-cents worth and your milage may vary, Matt